Vol. 1, No. 2, 2006

Download This Article
with up-to-date links in citations
Download this article. For Screen
For Printing
Recent Issues
Volume 4, Issue 6
Volume 4, Issue 5
Volume 4, Issue 4
Volume 4, Issue 3
Volume 4, Issue 2
Volume 4, Issue 1
Volume 3, Issue 10
Volume 3, Issue 9
Volume 3, Issue 8
Volume 3, Issue 7
Volume 3, Issue 6
Volume 3, Issue 5
Volume 3, Issue 4
Volume 3, Issue 3
Volume 3, Issue 2
Volume 3, Issue 1
Volume 2, Issue 10
Volume 2, Issue 9
Volume 2, Issue 8
Volume 2, Issue 7
Volume 2, Issue 6
Volume 2, Issue 5
Volume 2, Issue 4
Volume 2, Issue 3
Volume 2, Issue 2
Volume 2, Issue 1
Volume 1, Issue 8
Volume 1, Issue 7
Volume 1, Issue 6
Volume 1, Issue 5
Volume 1, Issue 4
Volume 1, Issue 3
Volume 1, Issue 2
Volume 1, Issue 1
The Journal
Cover
Editorial Board
Research Statement
Scientific Advantage
Submission Guidelines
Submission Page
Subscription Prices
License Agreement
Test your IP address
PACAM XI
Contacts

Andrew N. Norris

Abstract

The isotropic elastic moduli closest to a given anisotropic elasticity tensor are defined using three definitions of elastic distance: the standard Frobenius (Euclidean) norm, the Riemannian distance for tensors, and the log-Euclidean norm. The closest moduli are unique for the Riemannian and the log-Euclidean norms, independent of whether the difference in stiffness or compliance is considered. Explicit expressions for the closest bulk and shear moduli are presented for cubic materials, and an algorithm is described for finding them for materials with arbitrary anisotropy. The method is illustrated by application to a variety of materials, which are ranked according to their distance from isotropy.

Keywords

elastic moduli, anisotropy, Euclidean distance, Riemannian distance

Authors
Andrew N. Norris
Rutgers University
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
98 Brett Road
Piscataway, NJ 08854-8058
United States