Vol. 2, No. 7, 2007

Download This Article
with up-to-date links in citations
Download this article. For Screen
For Printing
Recent Issues
Volume 4, Issue 6
Volume 4, Issue 5
Volume 4, Issue 4
Volume 4, Issue 3
Volume 4, Issue 2
Volume 4, Issue 1
Volume 3, Issue 10
Volume 3, Issue 9
Volume 3, Issue 8
Volume 3, Issue 7
Volume 3, Issue 6
Volume 3, Issue 5
Volume 3, Issue 4
Volume 3, Issue 3
Volume 3, Issue 2
Volume 3, Issue 1
Volume 2, Issue 10
Volume 2, Issue 9
Volume 2, Issue 8
Volume 2, Issue 7
Volume 2, Issue 6
Volume 2, Issue 5
Volume 2, Issue 4
Volume 2, Issue 3
Volume 2, Issue 2
Volume 2, Issue 1
Volume 1, Issue 8
Volume 1, Issue 7
Volume 1, Issue 6
Volume 1, Issue 5
Volume 1, Issue 4
Volume 1, Issue 3
Volume 1, Issue 2
Volume 1, Issue 1
The Journal
Cover
Editorial Board
Research Statement
Scientific Advantage
Submission Guidelines
Submission Page
Subscription Prices
License Agreement
Test your IP address
PACAM XI
Contacts

Richard M. Christensen

Abstract

The stiffness and strength properties for open cell and closed cell low-density materials are collected and compared. These are the theoretical predictions for the Kelvin cell type and the oct-tet cell type of open cell forms and of the closed cell form from the generalized self-consistent method. The strength properties considered are those for plastic collapse and elastic instability, under both uniaxial stress and dilatational stress conditions.

Keywords

low density materials, open cell, closed cell

Authors
Richard M. Christensen
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
P. O. Box 808, L-356
Livermore, CA 94550
United States
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305