Vol. 3, No. 8, 2008

Download This Article
Download this article. For Screen
For Printing
Recent Issues
Volume 4, Issue 6
Volume 4, Issue 5
Volume 4, Issue 4
Volume 4, Issue 3
Volume 4, Issue 2
Volume 4, Issue 1
Volume 3, Issue 10
Volume 3, Issue 9
Volume 3, Issue 8
Volume 3, Issue 7
Volume 3, Issue 6
Volume 3, Issue 5
Volume 3, Issue 4
Volume 3, Issue 3
Volume 3, Issue 2
Volume 3, Issue 1
Volume 2, Issue 10
Volume 2, Issue 9
Volume 2, Issue 8
Volume 2, Issue 7
Volume 2, Issue 6
Volume 2, Issue 5
Volume 2, Issue 4
Volume 2, Issue 3
Volume 2, Issue 2
Volume 2, Issue 1
Volume 1, Issue 8
Volume 1, Issue 7
Volume 1, Issue 6
Volume 1, Issue 5
Volume 1, Issue 4
Volume 1, Issue 3
Volume 1, Issue 2
Volume 1, Issue 1
The Journal
Cover
Editorial Board
Research Statement
Scientific Advantage
Submission Guidelines
Submission Page
Subscription Prices
License Agreement
Test your IP address
PACAM XI
Contacts

Adair R. Aguiar & Roger L. Fosdick & Jesús A. G. Sánchez

Vol. 3 (2008), No. 8, 1403-1427
Abstract

We consider a class of two-dimensional problems in classical linear elasticity for which material overlapping occurs in the absence of singularities. Of course, material overlapping is not physically realistic, and one possible way to prevent it uses a constrained minimization theory. In this theory, a minimization problem consists of minimizing the total potential energy of a linear elastic body subject to the constraint that the deformation field must be locally invertible. Here, we use an interior and an exterior penalty formulation of the minimization problem together with both a standard finite element method and classical nonlinear programming techniques to compute the minimizers. We compare both formulations by solving a plane problem numerically in the context of the constrained minimization theory. The problem has a closed-form solution, which is used to validate the numerical results. This solution is regular everywhere, including the boundary. In particular, we show numerical results which indicate that, for a fixed finite element mesh, the sequences of numerical solutions obtained with both the interior and the exterior penalty formulations converge to the same limit function as the penalization is enforced. This limit function yields an approximate deformation field to the plane problem that is locally invertible at all points in the domain. As the mesh is refined, this field converges to the exact solution of the plane problem.

Keywords

aeolotropic elasticity, constrained minimization, penalty method, finite element method

Authors
Adair R. Aguiar
Department of Structural Engineering
São Carlos School of Engineering
University of São Paulo
Av. Trabalhador Sãocarlense, 400
13566-590 São Carlos, SP
Brazil
Roger L. Fosdick
Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics
University of Minnesota
107 Akerman Hall
110 Union St. SE
Minneapolis, MN 55455-0153
United States
Jesús A. G. Sánchez
Department of Structural Engineering
São Carlos School of Engineering
University of São Paulo
Av. Trabalhador Sãocarlense, 400
13566-590 São Carlos, SP
Brazil