Recent Issues |
| Volume 4, Issue 6 |
| Volume 4, Issue 5 |
| Volume 4, Issue 4 |
| Volume 4, Issue 3 |
| Volume 4, Issue 2 |
| Volume 4, Issue 1 |
| Volume 3, Issue 10 |
| Volume 3, Issue 9 |
| Volume 3, Issue 8 |
| Volume 3, Issue 7 |
| Volume 3, Issue 6 |
| Volume 3, Issue 5 |
| Volume 3, Issue 4 |
| Volume 3, Issue 3 |
| Volume 3, Issue 2 |
| Volume 3, Issue 1 |
| Volume 2, Issue 10 |
| Volume 2, Issue 9 |
| Volume 2, Issue 8 |
| Volume 2, Issue 7 |
| Volume 2, Issue 6 |
| Volume 2, Issue 5 |
| Volume 2, Issue 4 |
| Volume 2, Issue 3 |
| Volume 2, Issue 2 |
| Volume 2, Issue 1 |
| Volume 1, Issue 8 |
| Volume 1, Issue 7 |
| Volume 1, Issue 6 |
| Volume 1, Issue 5 |
| Volume 1, Issue 4 |
| Volume 1, Issue 3 |
| Volume 1, Issue 2 |
| Volume 1, Issue 1 |
|
|
Abstract
|
|
We present an energy-based
low-cycle fatigue criterion that can be used in analyzing and designing structures
made from shape memory alloys subjected to cyclic loading. Experimentally, a
response similar to plastic shakedown is observed. During the first cycles the
stress-strain curve shows a hysteresis loop which evolves during the first few cycles
before stabilizing. By adopting an analogy with plastic fatigue, it is shown that the
dissipated energy of the stabilized cycle is a relevant parameter for estimating the
number of cycles to failure of such materials. Following these observations,
we provide an application of the cyclic model, previously developed by the
authors within the framework of generalized standard materials with internal
constraints in order to evaluate such parameter. Numerical simulations are
presented along with a validation against experimental data in case of cyclic
superelasticity.
|
Keywords
cyclic pseudoelasticity, shape memory
alloys, SMA fatigue, cyclic loading, residual strain,
internal stress, dissipation
|
Milestones
Received: 14 December 2007
Revised: 14 April 2008
Accepted: 6 April 2008
Published: 12 April 2009
|
|
|
|
|