Recent Issues |
| Volume 4, Issue 6 |
| Volume 4, Issue 5 |
| Volume 4, Issue 4 |
| Volume 4, Issue 3 |
| Volume 4, Issue 2 |
| Volume 4, Issue 1 |
| Volume 3, Issue 10 |
| Volume 3, Issue 9 |
| Volume 3, Issue 8 |
| Volume 3, Issue 7 |
| Volume 3, Issue 6 |
| Volume 3, Issue 5 |
| Volume 3, Issue 4 |
| Volume 3, Issue 3 |
| Volume 3, Issue 2 |
| Volume 3, Issue 1 |
| Volume 2, Issue 10 |
| Volume 2, Issue 9 |
| Volume 2, Issue 8 |
| Volume 2, Issue 7 |
| Volume 2, Issue 6 |
| Volume 2, Issue 5 |
| Volume 2, Issue 4 |
| Volume 2, Issue 3 |
| Volume 2, Issue 2 |
| Volume 2, Issue 1 |
| Volume 1, Issue 8 |
| Volume 1, Issue 7 |
| Volume 1, Issue 6 |
| Volume 1, Issue 5 |
| Volume 1, Issue 4 |
| Volume 1, Issue 3 |
| Volume 1, Issue 2 |
| Volume 1, Issue 1 |
|
|
Abstract
|
|
Simple closed-form analytic
solutions have been obtained for the effect of initial residual stress on the bending
stiffness of a symmetric trilayer plate/beam and for the combined effect of surface
elasticity and initial surface stress on the bending stiffness of a nanofilm/nanobeam.
The relative effect of the initial residual stress is generally limited to the range of the
material yield strain. For nanofilms and nanobeams, the effect of the surface
elasticity reduces with an increase in the thickness, but the initial surface
stress effect can be retained at a constant level of up to the limit of elastic
strain if it can be controlled, for example by the application of an electrical
potential.
|
Keywords
residual stress, bending stiffness,
surface effect, nanoplate, nanobeam
|
Milestones
Received: 1 December 2008
Revised: 20 December 2008
Accepted: 31 December 2008
|
|
|
|
|