Vol. 188, No. 1, 1999

Download This Article
with up-to-date links in citations
Download this article. For Screen
For Printing
Recent Issues
Vol. 243: 1  2
Vol. 242: 1  2
Vol. 241: 1  2
Vol. 240: 1  2
Vol. 239: 1  2
Vol. 238: 1  2
Vol. 237: 1  2
Vol. 236: 1  2
Online Archive
Volume:
Issue:
     
Volumes 1–176are stored at Project Euclid
The Journal
Cover Page
Editorial Board
How To
Submissions Guidelines
Submissions Page
Subscriptions
Elect. License Agreement
Test your IP address
Contacts
To Appear

Mikhail Khovanov & Greg Kuperberg

Abstract

We compare two natural bases for the invariant space of a tensor product of irreducible representations of A2, or sl(3). One basis is the web basis, defined from a skein theory called the combinatorial A2 spider. The other basis is the dual canonical basis, the dual of the basis defined by Lusztig and Kashiwara. For sl(2) or A1, the web bases have been discovered many times and were recently shown to be dual canonical by Frenkel and Khovanov.

We prove that for sl(3), the two bases eventually diverge even though they agree in many small cases. The first disagreement comes in the invariant space Inv((V + × V + × V × V )×3), where V + and V are the two 3-dimensional representations of sl(3); if the tensor factors are listed in the indicated order, only 511 of the 512 invariant basis vectors coincide.

Authors
Mikhail Khovanov
 
Greg Kuperberg
University of California, Davis
Davis, CA 95616