Vol. 220, No. 1, 2005

Download This Article
with up-to-date links in citations
Download this article. For Screen
For Printing
Recent Issues
Vol. 243: 1  2
Vol. 242: 1  2
Vol. 241: 1  2
Vol. 240: 1  2
Vol. 239: 1  2
Vol. 238: 1  2
Vol. 237: 1  2
Vol. 236: 1  2
Online Archive
Volume:
Issue:
     
Volumes 1–176are stored at Project Euclid
The Journal
Cover Page
Editorial Board
How To
Submissions Guidelines
Submissions Page
Subscriptions
Elect. License Agreement
Test your IP address
Contacts
To Appear

Lakhdar Hammoudi

Volume 202:1 (2002), 93–97

The author acknowledges that the Theorem in the paper in question does not solve Eggert's conjecture completely, because it uses the fact that R ∩ (A⊕K) = {0}. Indeed, in the proof of the Theorem (page 96, lines 19 to 24), we assume that the unions in lines 17 and 18 are disjoint. If we add this hypothesis to the Theorem, which is fulfilled by graded algebras for example, the result is correct.

Therefore, the proof of the Theorem yields only a particular case of Eggert's conjecture. Eggert's conjecture in general remains open.

The author thanks Professors B. Amberg and L. Kazarin for pointing out the mistake and for the valuable discussions.

Authors
Lakhdar Hammoudi
Department of Mathematics
Ohio University-Chillicothe
101 University Drive
Chillicothe, OH 45601
United States